Best stand-alone evidence?

Discussions
User avatar
Statistical Mechanic
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26210
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:19 pm
Custom Title: Dostawca - sciany tekstu
Location: still in Greater Tomainia

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Statistical Mechanic » Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:25 pm

I don't see how deniers can make 3428 work for them. IIRC it is one of the documents that some pretend to have been forged. Many authors discuss 3428. Here is some background from HC: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... art-1.html
. . . all right we are two nations . . .

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:28 pm

Oozy_Substance wrote:
Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:05 pm
Just read 3428-PS again. Totally forgot about it.
Just a few questions :

1) Is the 55,000 figure is summary for all the deaths mentioned, or is it additional to the other figures mentioned? (16,000, 8,000)
Based upon another quick glance through its additional.

2) Just to see if I got it right, Kube is asking to halt the shipment of Jews to Minsk, so his troops could focus on killing Jews around. Can deniers twist it around like the figures mentioned above are actually regarding deportations?
I’ve seen deniers focus exclusively on the part of the document that discusses partisans. Their reasoning is that it was legal to shoot partisans and hostages, even women and children.
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Statistical Mechanic
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26210
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:19 pm
Custom Title: Dostawca - sciany tekstu
Location: still in Greater Tomainia

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Statistical Mechanic » Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:44 pm

Which makes no sense in terms of what the document says, inter alia "Naturally I and the SD would like it best if Jewry in the Generalbezirk of Byelorussia was finally eliminated after their labor is no longer required by the Wehrmacht. For the time being the essential requirements of the Wehrmacht, the main employer of Jewry, are being taken into consideration.". Kues' discussion here: https://inconvenienthistory.com/3/1/3141

I think Codoh folks have taken both positions - it's a forgery and it's not about Jewish liquidations. 55,000 Jewish partisans in the area . . . including old and young people and women who were in the eyes of the Germans unfit for work, people in the mentioned cities, etc. Amazing.
. . . all right we are two nations . . .

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:19 pm

It’s been some time since I looked into it but partisan operations acted independently of the mass shootings of Jews in the area.

We discussed this over at FG’s blog at one time, the position that CODOH dwellers take is the same those deniers took. Was this ever discussed at RODOH while you were there?
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Statistical Mechanic
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26210
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:19 pm
Custom Title: Dostawca - sciany tekstu
Location: still in Greater Tomainia

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Statistical Mechanic » Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:02 pm

There were definitely Jewish partisans in Belarus (e.g., Bielski brothers) . . . but

- most Soviet partisan commanders did not welcome Jewish fighters, and in heavily Polish areas, the partisans themselves were often overtly hostile to Jews
- as was the case in the Baltics, many of the Jewish partisan units were more family camps maintained in the forests to protect Jews from further actions and from which some of the members attempted revenge actions; these were not effective military forces
- the "nucleus of growing Soviet partisan resistance from the summer of 1942 came from Soviet PoWs, who were driven into the forests by the threat of starvation or being shot" (Dean); only later, in 1943 and thereafter, did Jews surviving the 2nd wave of the German extermination actions (which wiped out Jewish communities throughout the region) augment these forces appreciably
- so it was not until late 1943 and into 1944 (after the period under discussion) some Jewish partisans in the region were able to join Soviet partisans
- the partisan units in Belorussia and Ukraine never included very many Jewish fighters; according to Martin Dean's research: "there were some 370 000 Soviet partisans in Belorussia in 1944, of whom about 4 to 5 per cent (or 15 000) were Jews" - er, not 55 000 or more in summer 1942, not even close . . .
- overall in Belarus, membership in Soviet partisan units reflected more the makeup of the local population than anything but Russians were well represented generally

I don't recall this document being discussed at Rodoh but Kube and the Jewish extermination in Belarus certainly were.
. . . all right we are two nations . . .

User avatar
Oozy_Substance
Poster
Posts: 392
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:48 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Oozy_Substance » Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:12 am

Browsed HC for a bit and I think I found a good stand-alone evidence.

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... s-gas.html

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:47 am

A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:51 am

Hah, hunted around for these and finally found them:
Image
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:59 pm

Putting this here, Sergey’s excellent summary:
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Tue Mar 12, 2019 6:47 pm

A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:31 pm

Bump
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:16 pm

Bump
A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Sat May 11, 2019 3:28 am

A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11760
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Best stand-alone evidence?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Sat May 11, 2019 7:18 pm

A sober appraisal would put Himmler himself in the racially average band, or to some extent even below it: his face was round rather than oval, his nose more broad than slim, his normal bearing more ‘sagging’ than erect...
Longerich: Himmler

Hhhhhhhmmmmmm, is it possible that Carlo Mattogno is the greatest scholar the world has ever known?
:lol: :lol:
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=31585&p=713843#p713843