Alleged Zero-Emissions Paradox

Fun with supply and demand.
Tom Palven
Has More Than 5K Posts
Posts: 5647
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:29 am

Alleged Zero-Emissions Paradox

Post by Tom Palven » Mon May 21, 2018 8:14 am

" Zero-emission vehicles are only as clean as the electric power sources they plug into. Given the electricity fuel mix reasonably projected by the Energy Information Administration between now and 2050, both nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions from the power plants supplying zero-emission vehicles will exceed the emissions from new internal combustion vehicles.

"The study also finds that the carbon dioxide emission reductions achieved by zero-emission vehicles, even if all are powered by renewable sources, would be too small to detectably affect global temperatures and thus have no measurable economic value.
In contrast, the costs of federal and state subsidies for zero-emission vehicles and associated infrastructure are both real and substantial. “In California alone, the total cost of ZEV subsidies, including federal tax credits and state rebates for ZEV purchases, as well as subsidies for private and public charging infrastructure, is likely to exceed $100 billion,” Lesser writes in his study. Such policies also raise serious equity concerns, because the subsidies transfer wealth from lower- and middle-income households to wealthier households."

https://fee.org/articles/zero-emission- ... ion-study/
If one can be taught to believe absurdities, one can commit atrocities. --Voltaire

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 15596
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am
Custom Title: bobbo da existential pragmatist

Re: Alleged Zero-Emissions Paradox

Post by bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon May 21, 2018 3:43 pm

Sounds like more effort/subsidies are needed to create zero pollution energy sources.......even as they are coming on board faster than earlier estimated.

..................how else does society change?

..................look at the subsidies for Big Oil/Nuke.

..................100 billion sounds high to me..........

Once people finally agree AGW is going to kill us all, the cost to switch to Green is going to far exceed the billions spent today.........and sadly, won't advert great damage that could have been avoided except for off center diversionary issues like this one. aka: the import is NOT do away with subsidies/support/research but rather how to spend the Bucks more effectively.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Gord
Obnoxious Weed
Posts: 33816
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Alleged Zero-Emissions Paradox

Post by Gord » Wed May 23, 2018 9:35 am

Hmm. Foundation for Economic Eduation is a libertarian economic think-tank, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research is a conservative think tank, and Jonathan Lesser is the president of president of Continental Economics and seems to be associated somehow with the Heritage Foundation, another conservative public policy think tank.

While he might have a point about "zero-emission vehicles [being] only as clean as the electric power sources they plug into," that is not a reason to stop subsidising ZEVs; it's a reason to stop using coal to produce the electricity that powers them.

The problem is, he's an economist and a Conservative. He probably doesn't care about the most important goal of ZEVs, which is to provide a means to reduce emissions. In order to reduce emissions, society needs to shift from its heavily polluting power sources. Having the vehicles available to do that is a primary element in achieving that goal. Getting rid of coal is another primary element. While doing one without doing the other is a waste of resources, it doesn't mean you should abandon the one you're managing to do -- it means you need to work harder to achieve the other goal(s) as well.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
Is Trump in jail yet?

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8888
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Alleged Zero-Emissions Paradox

Post by landrew » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:50 pm

"Springtime for rebates and subsidies..."
Winter when it all ends.
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.