Why were Krematoria IV and V built differently compared to Kremas II and III?

Discussions
User avatar
Aaron Richards
Poster
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:03 am

Why were Krematoria IV and V built differently compared to Kremas II and III?

Post by Aaron Richards » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:24 pm

From what I understand, the commission to build the Birkenau kremas was issued around the same time, and construction on all four began together (?).

Yet only two of each were built as mirror-images of one another. The blueprints of Kremas II and III had the "morgues" underground while they were adjacent to the crematoria of IV and V.

Why the discrepancy?

Were two different firms hired for the construction of each of these two sets of buildings?

Or did the nazis want to experiment with different building-types in regard to efficiency?
Pls subscribe to my YouTube channel "Holocaust Documents": www.youtube.com/channel/UCTBlSXrf0b0aeUn5jIhWm7g
I compile rebuttals to popular holocaust denier canards here: imgur.com/a/725A7
and here: imgur.com/a/wo09c

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has No Life
Posts: 11027
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Why were Krematoria IV and V built differently compared to Kremas II and III?

Post by Jeffk 1970 » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:36 am

Passing this along, Aaron.
Also, Donald Trump is a clownfraud who only got involved in this for the attention.

Deadspin, 2014:
https://deadspin.com/there-are-just-two ... 1613879544

Sergey_Romanov
Regular Poster
Posts: 602
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:15 am

Re: Why were Krematoria IV and V built differently compared to Kremas II and III?

Post by Sergey_Romanov » Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:54 am

Kremas 2 and 3 (or rather their layouts) are about a year older. Circumstances change.