Lance Kennedy wrote:Looks like a variation on the wristband used to prevent seasickness. I predict the two have one thing in common. They don't work!
Gwarh wrote:That’s excellent news Atimolos, and I'm happy for you.
Not to be a jerk, but anecdotal evidence is effectivly useless in proving the effectiveness of any product, let alone a product that claims a medical benefit.
I'm looking/hoping for a scientific study, that is online somewhere that speaks to the effectiveness, if any of the headband.
Lance Kennedy wrote:Rick
You are, of course, entitled to be leery of a study done by a drug company that promotes their own product. Proper scientists are probably even more leery. But good science is by far the best guide we have.
rickoshay85 wrote:Lance Kennedy wrote:Rick
You are, of course, entitled to be leery of a study done by a drug company that promotes their own product. Proper scientists are probably even more leery. But good science is by far the best guide we have.
What we have are good scientists and bad scientists. Is that what you're saying?
Gord wrote:rickoshay85 wrote:Lance Kennedy wrote:Rick
You are, of course, entitled to be leery of a study done by a drug company that promotes their own product. Proper scientists are probably even more leery. But good science is by far the best guide we have.
What we have are good scientists and bad scientists. Is that what you're saying?
No, good science and bad drug companies.
Poodle wrote:That should be enough for anyone.
Austin Harper wrote:How is your body "out of balance" and how do the supplements "return it to balance"?
drfeelgood wrote:...The Cefaly works on the same principle; which is to apply an electrical impulse to the nerve.
I haven't found any studies using the Cefaly so there is no proof it works or doesn't work.
Monster wrote:Austin Harper wrote:How is your body "out of balance" and how do the supplements "return it to balance"?
Exactly what I was going to say!
And how do you when it's "balanced"? How is such a thing measured, I mean.
Gord wrote:drfeelgood wrote:...The Cefaly works on the same principle; which is to apply an electrical impulse to the nerve.
How does it apply the electrical impulse to the nerve? Is it battery powered? What's the amperage? Doesn't the skin tend to disperse electrical impulses, preventing them from reaching the nerves?
The Trigeminal nerve (Cranial nerve 5) is the main SENSORY nerve feeding most of the face, so the ends of the nerve do terminate in the skin. So when the Cefaly is placed over the area of the trigeminal nerve, the electrical impulses travel through the skin and into the nerve. Yes, it is battery powered. It uses two AAA batteries, and the way they are installed, it would look like they are in parallel, not series (although I could be wrong) so it would be max 1.5 volts, but I have no idea how many amps.I haven't found any studies using the Cefaly so there is no proof it works or doesn't work.
Their website boldly states, MEDICALLY TESTED. If that's true, those tests should be available somewhere.
bigtim wrote:I predit the reash of newbies with 1 or 2 posts all on the same thread mean they are the same person advocating this piece of crap....
drfeelgood wrote:bigtim wrote:I predit the reash of newbies with 1 or 2 posts all on the same thread mean they are the same person advocating this piece of crap....
This forum has a good name, but too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind and assume that everything is a scam.
drfeelgood wrote:...too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind....
drfeelgood wrote: but too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind
OlegTheBatty wrote:drfeelgood wrote: but too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind
How many would be just enough?
drfeelgood wrote:Ok, I get your point. Like I said, I am new to this forum, so I didn't know that being "over skeptic" was a common accusation.
I guess what I meant to say is to wait for me or others to get the scientific data (Papers) and share the results, then make the conclusion that it is a piece of junk or not.
drfeelgood wrote:I just found this forum a few days ago. This forum has a good name, but too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind and assume that everything is a scam.

Gwarh wrote:I wanted to post here and see if anyone else has heard of or come across this product. And if so have any "red flags" been raised about it in your reading/research.
The Cefaly Headband, which claims to reduce and relive symptoms of Migraine Headaches.
Website: http://www.cefaly.ca/
Similar product for sale on amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Cefaly-Kit-electr ... B004LSJJVI
Two of my Co-workers were discussing purchasing it as they both suffer from Migraine headaches, but my BS Radar Alarm went off when I heard them discussing it, and visited the website. If it really can do what it claims to do why isn't it proscribed by Doctors on a Mass scale.
I want to be wrong as I sympathize with the pain they go through when under a Migraine attack. But I also don't want them to be hoodwinked by another Metal/Magnetic Bracelet which this time they wear on their heads instead of their wrists.
Has anyone encountered or read up on this device? My Googling comes up with next to nothing other than anecdotal evidence and a list of studies cited on the official website, but of course no links to the actual study results.
Any info, input, advice is much appreciated.
Lance Kennedy wrote:Not true, Rick.
Any remedy that is genuinely therapeutic will work without the belief factor. An antibiotic will kill bacteria whether you believe in it or not.
Major Malfunction wrote:drfeelgood wrote:Ok, I get your point. Like I said, I am new to this forum, so I didn't know that being "over skeptic" was a common accusation.
I guess what I meant to say is to wait for me or others to get the scientific data (Papers) and share the results, then make the conclusion that it is a piece of junk or not.
You mean do as you say, not as you do?drfeelgood wrote:I just found this forum a few days ago. This forum has a good name, but too many of the skeptics here do not have an open mind and assume that everything is a scam.
So you just found this forum a few days ago, and after only a few posts, and not engaging any of the posters in conversation, have already concluded that too many of the members have closed minds.
The responses to my neutral information and the sarcastic responses to the poster who talked about being "out of balance" in addition to many other posts in other areas of the forum that I read led me to the conclusion about not having an open mind, but I do apologize for saying that- you are correct, I should engage in conversation with posters first and spend more time in this forum before making any judgments. I am sorry for saying that.
Sorry if we don't hold our collective breath while you get you papers ready.
That's OK, the original poster who is actually interested in this product might wait. If no one is interested I won't pursue it any further.
The MO of your sockpuppets is so transparent as to be laughable. You know what they say about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?
I do not know what you mean by the "MO of our sockpuppets"
I don't know why you're so obsessed with infiltrating the "Skeptics' Ranks". If it's for the trolling lulz, then I suggest you seek help, because you have a problem. We know when we're being trolled, anyway, so it's us that's lolling at you.
Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
If you think you're worthy to join us, you just need to demonstrate a little personal integrity and some social graces, pretty much the same rules for any human society, and we'll be more than happy to discuss even the most out-there and crack-pot ideas. That's why we're here, afterall.
But it doesn't mean that your particular out-there, crack-pot idea deserves any more merit than the last.
rickoshay85 wrote:Lance Kennedy wrote:Not true, Rick.
Any remedy that is genuinely therapeutic will work without the belief factor. An antibiotic will kill bacteria whether you believe in it or not.
You need to have some kind of believable assurance to take any remedy in the first place...
drfeelgood wrote:However, you talk about integrity and social graces yet write a somewhat rude post with unsubstantiated accusations
drfeelgood wrote:rickoshay85 wrote:Lance Kennedy wrote:Not true, Rick.
Any remedy that is genuinely therapeutic will work without the belief factor. An antibiotic will kill bacteria whether you believe in it or not.
You need to have some kind of believable assurance to take any remedy in the first place...
The "Placebo Effect" is strong, and it can improve the effectiveness of drugs used for things like depression, but whether you believe it or not, antibiotics will kill suceptible bacteria every time!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest