9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Who else knows what we know, Jerry?
User avatar
TruthMakesPeace
BANNED
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:54 pm

9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby TruthMakesPeace » Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:29 am

March 15, 2015 is the 2nd Annual 9/11 Physics Debate.
It will be broadcast on Dr. Kevin Barrett's No Lies Radio Show.

Here is last year's debate. No PhD in Physics with a
Hirsch Index >=50 was willing to defend the Bush Story
of 9/11 (BS911) also known as the Official Conspiracy
Theory (OCT), despite a $1000 prize.

In fact, no one with a B.S, M.S. or PhD in Physics applied.
Only one applicant, from JREF with a B.A in political science,
applied to debate Dr. Griscom, but he had never taken
a college course in physics, and had a Hirsch Index = 0.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m8XaLdGKBw

Please see if the Skeptic Forum can find a PhD in Physics.
ANETA.org has lowered the Hirsch Index score to 40,
to make it easier to find a physicist willing to debate.

The honorarium for the winner, to be determined by an email
survey to 30 university physics departments, is .911 Bitcoin.

Please see this web site for more details.
http://www.911Debate.org

If you know of a qualified applicant please contact
info@ANETA.org Thank you.

User avatar
TruthMakesPeace
BANNED
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:54 pm

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby TruthMakesPeace » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:03 am

We CAN change the way the American public and the world sees 9/11, in the light of truth which dispels the darkness of lies. According to a YouGov.com poll, only 40% of Americans still believe the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911). Falsers are a dwindling fringe minority. 9/11 Truth is the majority view now. Satyam eva jayate (Sanskrit for Truth alone triumphs).

User avatar
OutOfBreath
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2049
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:38 pm
Custom Title: Persistent ponderer
Location: Norway

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby OutOfBreath » Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:21 pm

Just makes the point quite clearly doesn't it?
Noone with better things to do wants to waste their time and/or credibility with this sideshow.
(Besides, for 1000$ to stand there and have full knowledge of the official report and every detail of it... Sounds a bit on the cheap side, factoring in that professors make an average of $87000 in the US.)

(edit) Got curious about what the blazes the Hirsch index was anyway, and from what I can gather shooting for someone of 50+ is fairly ambitious. (Would mean that the person's 50th most cited paper was cited 50 times)
For the curious:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index
http://subjectguides.uwaterloo.ca/conte ... id=1885850


Peace
Dan
What is perceived as real becomes real in its consequences.

"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4928
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby Monster » Wed Feb 11, 2015 4:33 pm

TruthMakesPeace wrote:March 15, 2015 is the 2nd Annual 9/11 Physics Debate.
It will be broadcast on Dr. Kevin Barrett's No Lies Radio Show.

Here is last year's debate. No PhD in Physics with a
Hirsch Index >=50 was willing to defend the Bush Story
of 9/11 (BS911) also known as the Official Conspiracy
Theory (OCT), despite a $1000 prize.

In fact, no one with a B.S, M.S. or PhD in Physics applied.
Only one applicant, from JREF with a B.A in political science,
applied to debate Dr. Griscom, but he had never taken
a college course in physics, and had a Hirsch Index = 0.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m8XaLdGKBw

Please see if the Skeptic Forum can find a PhD in Physics.
ANETA.org has lowered the Hirsch Index score to 40,
to make it easier to find a physicist willing to debate.

The honorarium for the winner, to be determined by an email
survey to 30 university physics departments, is .911 Bitcoin.

Please see this web site for more details.
http://www.911Debate.org

If you know of a qualified applicant please contact
info@ANETA.org Thank you.

I'm amazed that there's an actual physics debate. And specifically for 9/11.

A-number, your statement that "everybody knows it was an inside job" is false.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Austin Harper
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4787
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:22 pm
Custom Title: Rock Chalk Astrohawk
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby Austin Harper » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:53 pm

Sounds like you're in an echo chamber of crazy people.
Dum ratio nos ducet, valebimus et multa bene geremus.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4928
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby Monster » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:06 pm

A-number wrote:
Monster wrote: I'm amazed that there's an actual physics debate. And specifically for 9/11.

A-number, your statement that "everybody knows it was an inside job" is false.
NO it's not!!

There is a small %age who is completely oblivious, yeah!! but just about every person I spoke to, if somebody else brought up the subject, they confirm that they believe it was an inside job. Yeah, the majority now believes that the criminals that did 9/11 are INSIDERS and not outsiders. So TMP is right about that.
Hell google the following:
Firefighters for 9/11 truth
Architectural Egineers for 9/11
Pilots for 9/11 truth
cops for 9/11
and the list goes on...

I am sorry but only a dork will remain that way in this day and age.

I don't believe that 911 was an inside job.

Google is full of stuff debunking the 911 conspiracy myths too. Here, read this if you feel like it.

http://www.debunking911.com/index.html

Democracy Now! interviews the Loose Changers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d0XEHahJ2Q
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
TruthMakesPeace
BANNED
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:54 pm

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby TruthMakesPeace » Thu Feb 12, 2015 6:50 am

Loose Change was well done, considering that the men were young, and did not have PhDs, nor access to expensive equipment. However it is not the only evidence against the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911). There are 21 papers published peer reviewed scientific journals - publications which are independent from, and not connected any 9/11 truth activists. See the Collected Articles of 9/11 research was http://www.911CA.org Plus there are over 70 peer reviewed papers on the http://www.JournalOf911Studies.org Plus there are papers at http://www.ScientistsFor911Truth.org including the paper Dr. John Wyndham (PhD, Cambridge University) presented at the IEEE.org conference.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4928
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby Monster » Thu Feb 12, 2015 4:29 pm

A-number wrote:
Monster wrote:
A-number wrote:
Monster wrote: I'm amazed that there's an actual physics debate. And specifically for 9/11.
I don't believe that 911 was an inside job.

You are afraid to consider the Fact because, you do not want to believe that the majority of the US Government is made out of nothing but criminals and gangsters. It's a hard thing to digest. Me too when I was forced to face that I went through very bad phase, I am surprised, even tremendously shocked I did not have a nervous break down.

As far as the debate, see the Architectural Engineers documentary. There are bunch of them on there, all college grades who worked with big major US firms for 30, 40 years as Engineers, Architects, Executives, etc. On the documentary, they specifically state their professional records and go on discussing the specifics of the 9/11 bombing.

I believe that a substantial number of US government politicians are criminals and gangsters, but not the majority. It's easy to digest.

I've read about 911 physics, and pro-inside-job and con-inside-job arguments. The evidence is against it being an inside job.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10212
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: 9/11 Physics Debate, 2nd annual, March 15, 2015

Postby Pyrrho » Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:31 pm

Okay, here's the thing. If people want to discuss 9/11, fine. If you want to advertise, no.

The OP is basically acting as a "comment spammer," advertising various sites and events. I cannot allow that to continue. Topic locked.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.


Return to “Conspiracies”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests