Zanders wrote: There seem to be many events like this out there, not confirming any specific religion or anything like that. But it certainly raises questions and makes me doubt my once purely rational view of how the world works. There does seem to be some sort of "paranormal" forces out there. I am wondering how these could be explained by any conventional logic, because I am stumped.
Zanders wrote:I doubt the other psychic claims, it was just the vision of the fire that fascinated me. If you read more about Emanuel Swedenborg it is highly unlikely that he would set anyone's house on fire. Also, the fire started a long time after he was gone, so I don't see how he could have had it planned. He did not predict the fire, he just turned pale and started worrying when the fire started, and was somehow able to sigh in relief when it went out, knowing just how far away it was from his house.
Matthew Ellard wrote:Zanders wrote:I doubt the other psychic claims, it was just the vision of the fire that fascinated me. If you read more about Emanuel Swedenborg it is highly unlikely that he would set anyone's house on fire. Also, the fire started a long time after he was gone, so I don't see how he could have had it planned. He did not predict the fire, he just turned pale and started worrying when the fire started, and was somehow able to sigh in relief when it went out, knowing just how far away it was from his house.
Well I'm not saying he did it. I'm suggesting that it is more probable that he was aware that someone else was going to do it, than the paranormal theory that a burning house sent him a psychic message. The jails are full of arsonists who pay other people to burn down houses while they have an alibi elsewhere. There are no tested examples of psychic messages. I am applying Occam's razor.
This is why I asked you to look at modern examples. It allows us to look in depth at what happened or is happening.
Zanders wrote: It appears that the specifics he gave were confirmed, but this story could still be fake, .
A-number wrote:Trust me brother/sister, anything that muslimists have to say or claim I have no interest in it whatsoever.
Zanders wrote:
Well, in truth the group that this man started are not really Islam. They are more of an odd racist cult that embraces parts of Islam.
Look up "The Nation of Islam" on wikipedia for more information on that, it's pretty freaky. Also, as I stated earlier his "miraculous knowledge" was debunked.
A-number wrote:Zanders wrote:
Well, in truth the group that this man started are not really Islam. They are more of an odd racist cult that embraces parts of Islam.
"Parts of islam" (I say this for them not you), as if any of it is rose-y.Look up "The Nation of Islam" on wikipedia for more information on that, it's pretty freaky. Also, as I stated earlier his "miraculous knowledge" was debunked.
Muslims are racist and discriminating when in their turf. They might, when abroad, claim they are not in order to apeal to any potential recruit but in truth, they are.
Zanders wrote: Here are some excerpts from Immanuel Kant's writing on Swedenborg and the fire, along with some other interesting information.
http://www.newtheism.com/papers/W.Woofe ... nities.htm
Saint Joseph of Cupertino (Italian: San Giuseppe da Copertino) (June 17, 1603 – September 18, 1663) was an Italian saint. He was said to have been remarkably unclever, but prone to miraculous levitation and intense ecstatic visions that left him gaping.[1] In turn, he is recognized as the patron saint of air travelers, aviators, astronauts, people with a mental handicap, test takers, and weak students. He was canonized in the year 1767.
Daniel Dunglas Home (pronounced 'Hume') (March 20, 1833 – June 21, 1886) was a Scottish Spiritualist, famous as a physical medium with the reported ability to levitate to a variety of heights, speak with the dead, and to produce rapping and knocks in houses at will.
The Cottingley Fairies appear in a series of five photographs taken by Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths, two young cousins who lived in Cottingley, near Bradford in England. In 1917, when the first two photographs were taken, Elsie was 16 years old and Frances was 10. The pictures came to the attention of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who used them to illustrate an article on fairies he had been commissioned to write for the Christmas 1920 edition of The Strand Magazine. Conan Doyle, as a Spiritualist, was enthusiastic about the photographs, and interpreted them as clear and visible evidence of psychic phenomena. Public reaction was mixed; some accepted that the images were genuine, but others believed they had been faked.
Spontaneous human combustion (SHC) is a name used to describe alleged cases of the burning of a living human body without an apparent external source of ignition. While there have been about 200 cited cases[1] worldwide over a period of around 300 years, most of the alleged cases are characterized by the lack of a thorough investigation, or rely heavily on hearsay and oral testimony. In many of the more recent cases, where photographic evidence is available, it is alleged that there was an external source of heat present (often cigarettes), and nothing occurred "spontaneously."
Bunyip wrote:If there is no apparent explantion for a thing, I think the most rational explanations are; my own ignorance (the most likely explanation) or 'we don' know yet'
Jumping to the conclusion of say the paranormal or some convoluted conspiracy theory based on the oxymoron 'common sense' is a secular equivalent of ' the god of the gaps'. (argument from ignorance)
To debunk claims of the paranormal ,use scientific method: Observation based evidence and repeatability.Unverified written accounts are not reliable as a general rule. The older they are the less reliable they are likely to be. Human beings ARE gullible,and DO deceive themselves and others.
It's worth noting that no one has managed to claim one of the various large cash prizes offered for proving psychic abilities.
Zanders wrote:Of course, that could be later additions to the story the more people told it.
jenthehero wrote:It is a magic trick. There is lots of b.s. in plain sight and anyone with a brain can read the debate and see the conflicts and deceptions.
Hint don't listen to people like Matt or any of the regulars on here, most are deceptive puppets with no debate only trickery and the usual dark games.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSpkLk0vYmk
Trick one, fraudulent conveyance of facts
Trick two control the debate (delete or moderate)
Trick three call it conspiracy or crazy.... like there has never been a conspiracy in the life of man.
Ignore
control media....
It is all real and obvious
Zanders wrote:
Also, can anyone give me some other stories or rumors of clairvoyance similar to the Swedenborg fire event? Even if they were to be hoaxes, I want some other events that is similar.
Zanders wrote:Hey A-number, can you please unblock me so I can send you private messages? There was a misunderstanding and the reason you blocked me wasn't actually what I said. I would really like to clear that up.
A-number wrote:Zanders wrote:Hey A-number, can you please unblock me so I can send you private messages? There was a misunderstanding and the reason you blocked me wasn't actually what I said. I would really like to clear that up.
Mary is the Mother of My Lord and that's that brother. It's not negociable
. And just as I already told you via pm, I believe that she, along with Jesus, is Sinless. Somebody else called her what you have before you to me on this forum, that didn't advance their cause. Furthermore. It is against forum rules to open a second account. The one from which you contacted me 2wice after I blocked you? I know. I am "stupid", "dumb", "idiotic" and "all of the other names". But Mary is remaining where she is at on my personal map
. There is nothing to discuss about that. And your belief does not bother me a bit, so be at peace, I just refuse to let it intoxicate my mind. And that is my right.
In regard to the thread, I am going to ck that book on the library and give you more infor about that happening because I personally find it remarkable to say the least.
jenthehero wrote:It is a magic trick. Hint don't listen to people like Matt or any of the regulars on here, most are deceptive puppets with no debate only trickery and the usual dark games.
jenthehero wrote:Ya, I guess Randi the king skeptic also confessed magician is weird. Sorry the truth in your face is so painful.
In case you are not converted I will gladly start a thread and explain the trickery used in a pretend debate on their part... Don't worry you can see if you open your eyes.
The truth will illuminate this hack darkness of the puppet crew. It is easy.
Start a thread, I will show you.
Name calling is usually reserved for the final battle, they will call stacks and stacks of information conspiracy but you will see the conflicts and the deception and know this rotten fruit comes from a bad tree.
What a peach.
jenthehero wrote:[...]The truth will illuminate this hack darkness[...]
Thylacine wrote:Zanders wrote:Of course, that could be later additions to the story the more people told it.
With several billion people living on the planet, millions of unlikely coincidences happen to them each day — most prosaic and of no interest. Interesting stories of peculiar happenings, however, have a way of becoming exaggerated as people repeatedly tell them. I suspect that if you had been there, knew the entire story and were privy to all the facts, the Swedish story (and all or most of the others) wouldn't seem nearly as miraculous or far-fetched.
With several billion people living on the planet, millions of unlikely coincidences happen to them each day — most prosaic and of no interest. Interesting stories of peculiar happenings, however, have a way of becoming exaggerated as people repeatedly tell them. I suspect that if you had been there, knew the entire story and were privy to all the facts, the Swedish story (and all or most of the others) wouldn't seem nearly as miraculous or far-fetched.
I don't believe in anything paranormal, but the vastness of the unexplained is forever being underestimated. I can't account for all the unexplained things which seem to be ubiquitous in our world, (like some skeptics are wont to do) but I see no reason why all the explanations couldn't lie somewhere within the vastness of that ocean to which we are still ignorant.
Pyrrho wrote:"It's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong." - Richard Feynman
Pyrrho wrote:"It's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong." - Richard Feynman
Zanders wrote:
Again, you show that you did not read what I said right.
A-number wrote:Zanders wrote:
Again, you show that you did not read what I said right.
You don't seem to be able to read yourself right, so why are you shocked that I "can't"? you shouldn't.
Zanders wrote:A-number wrote:Zanders wrote:
Again, you show that you did not read what I said right.
You don't seem to be able to read yourself right, so why are you shocked that I "can't"? you shouldn't.
You need to work on your reading comprehension.
Return to UFOs, Cryptozoology, and The Paranormal
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest