David wrote:Hello Matthew- I see the bones of maybe 2 individuals.
Uh...where are the bones of the other 898,000 people?
Matthew Ellard wrote:David wrote:Hello Matthew- I see the bones of maybe 2 individuals.
Uh...where are the bones of the other 898,000 people?
Your idols, the Nazis, were simple criminals who wanted to hide evidence that they executed almost a million people at Treblinka. For this reason they cremated the bodies of executed victims from an earlier period and as new executions were made. The ash mixed in with these bones may contain the remains of another 10,000 victims.
Didn't you know anything about this? ( Why would you? You are a holocaust denier who will pretend Treblinka was a transit camp but never say to where. Evidence just isn't your "thing")
David wrote: I understand your claim that criminals wanted to hide evidence but leaving the bodies/bones of the victims around is not a very good way of hiding evidence.
David wrote: I also understand the Believer theory of a complex and as yet
not understood German system of totally destroying all remains
of hundreds of thousands of human bodies.
David wrote: But the pictures you have cited show only the bones of two
or three individuals. You are claiming that "The ash mixed in with these
bones may contain the remains of another 10,000 victims."
Are you claiming that the Germans made "ash piles" of 10,000
bodies and then MARKED these sites with human bones?
Something in your strident assertions does not make sense.
Pyrrho wrote: If Treblinka was a "transit camp", why were several hundred bodies discovered there?
David wrote: There were two Treblinka Camps, Pyrrho.
Treblinka I was a labor camp which ran a huge gravel quarry.
Treblinka II was also a camp where captured Soviet munitions were
processed. Both camps together had about 5,000 inmates on the average.
Pyrrho wrote: If several hundred bodies were discovered there, why do people claim that no mass graves were discovered at Treblinka?
David wrote: Depends on how you define "mass." Among
normal people a mass grave would have 20 - 200 bodies in it.
But remember that we are discussing the amazing tales of Holocaust
Belief. When you are claiming 900,000 victims were killed at Treblinka
you better come up with "mass graves" with 50,000 - 100,000 bodies
in them.
David wrote: In fact, the number bodies that were found are entirely consistent with the "normal" operation of a camp with an average population of 5,000 detainees
operating for 2 1/2 years.
David wrote:No one educated does. The story of "all bodies having been
destroyed" is a fiction created by Latter Day Believers to "explain" the lack of
any "Holocaust level" mass graves.
Matthew Ellard wrote:Pyrrho wrote: IPyrrho wrote: If several hundred bodies were discovered there, why do people claim that no mass graves were discovered at Treblinka?David wrote: Depends on how you define "mass." Among
normal people a mass grave would have 20 - 200 bodies in it.
But remember that we are discussing the amazing tales of Holocaust
Belief. When you are claiming 900,000 victims were killed at Treblinka
you better come up with "mass graves" with 50,000 - 100,000 bodies
in them.
"Ash" David how many times can you forget this without looking like you have brain damage?
Hello Matthew- I understand your screaming about "ash."
It is inconsistant with the Polish claims of "Numerous human remains were found by these excavations, partially still in a state of decomposition."
As I said, Believers are inconsistent.
David wrote: Hello Matthew- I understand your screaming about "ash."
It is inconsistant with the Polish claims of "Numerous human remains were found by these excavations, partially still in a state of decomposition." As I said, Believers are inconsistent.
Matthew Ellard wrote:David wrote: Hello Matthew- I understand your screaming about "ash."
It is inconsistant with the Polish claims of "Numerous human remains were found by these excavations, partially still in a state of decomposition." As I said, Believers are inconsistent.
No, you obviously don't understand why there is a mix of ash and tissue. This is because you refuse to read the Polish report.
David wrote: What I do understand is that if a body still has its flesh then it was
not cremated very thoroughly...
David wrote: which means that you Believers are
about 899,800 bodies short from your Treblinka tales.
David wrote: Reports by Soviet and Polish investigations from the 1940's tend to greatly exaggerate and distort facts and are not reliable.
Matthew Ellard wrote: Not all bodies were completely cremated [/color]
Then they should still be there. Howabout a current picture?David wrote: Reports by Soviet and Polish investigations from the 1940's tend to greatly exaggerate and distort facts and are not reliable.
CRAP. You made that up on the spot. You have never read a Polish or Soviet report and still refuse to do so today. You are just a lying holocaust denier promoting nazi ideology.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest