A Mathematical-Epistemilogical Discrepency in one of Einstei

[TheQuantumQuestioner]

http://www.ilovephysics.com/forum/viewt ... 5793#p5793

Abstract

Here i demonstrate rather simply how Einsteins ''conceptual directionality'' towards his methods used in his formulation of absolute rest energy particles are put to the challenge since i show that his equations do not satisfy an absolute rest because his energy residing is still effected by the continuous presence of Zero-Point Energy. In an attempt to reformulate his equation, so that Einstein does not model particles at rest with a zero kinetic energy, but rather i show that we can [slightly] alter his equation to suit the quantum mechanical format.

Layman

In the most basic of examples, kinetic energy makes the entire system of a moving photon. If the particle has a mass, then kinetic energy and thus inertial matter is added to the particle. However, accoridng to Einstein, if his equations allowed a totally zero kinetic energy his equations would describe simply a particle without any displacement required. Two striking problems remain in this, because it is known that every corner of space and time has at least 1/2Mc^2 of energy! This means that no particle is ever at rest, and so highlights why Einsteins equation cannot suffice a kinetic energy of a system to be a zero quantity.