I was confused for someone else..Nice..

[Shen1986]

James Cunningham "real" username Shen1986 on the skeptic forum Bruce Greysons ectoplasm cheesecloth debunked and has debunked cheesecloth ectoplasm lolz Parapsychologists admit 98% of paranormal phemomena does not exist 98% of parapsychologists admit parapsychology is fraud? 2% ectoplasm cheesecloth left to debunk. Mal Yankton (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Taken from: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk: ... 4/Archive1

This is touching really. The person who wrote this knows nothing. I have other user names on JREF and Rationalwiki:

On JREF its Lukas1986:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=265174

On Rationalwiki its Shen-Du..

Oh boy this person did a lousy job..

[Shen1986]

The person who posted it is Mal Yankton:

mal yankton (@MalYankton)
October 19, 2013

Three cheers for Tumbleman! May he have the wikipedia pseudoskeptics wishing they’d never tangled with him. His jiggery pokery at James Randi forum under the name “Bubblefish” is legendary…
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p= ... stcount=71

Taken from: http://weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com/2013 ... tumbleman/

mal yankton (@MalYankton)
October 20, 2013

Getting those ideologue admins banned is a splendid idea. TUMBLEMAN, TELL US WHAT YOU WANT US TO DO.

Taken from: http://weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com/2013 ... tumbleman/

mal yankton (@MalYankton)
October 23, 2013

Righto guv, just sayin’…the power to set things right on Wikipedia does exist, they couldn’t possibly stop Tumbleman and zeitghostmedia…

Taken from: http://weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com/2013 ... tumbleman/

If its the person who did this. Then I see his motivation. As always believers are weak in their looks and research. They cannot even do a right research..

[Whitedude]

Deleted due to the request of Jon Donnis

[Shen1986]

He's also targeted Jon Donnis (founder of the bad psychics forum) and skeptical editors on Wikipedia. His target now seems to be James Cunningham or yourself. He's targeted me in the past. It's best to ignore the issue.

Does that mean I am famous?

I have my own stalker.

It seems when someone is doing skeptical work then a stalker will show up. I think that when someone does his job well like you did then he will be stalked. I think this shows that we have done very good skeptical analyses of problems and this makes them mad.

I take this now as a laughing matter and it proves me the opposite what he wanted to achieve that I am doing a good job if I was not then no one would attack me and tell lies about me and you.. It seems we have done a great job so far.

[TheUltimateBlitz1]

He's also targeted Jon Donnis (founder of the bad psychics forum) and skeptical editors on Wikipedia. His target now seems to be James Cunningham or yourself. He's targeted me in the past. It's best to ignore the issue.

Does that mean I am famous?

I have my own stalker.

It seems when someone is doing skeptical work then a stalker will show up. I think that when someone does his job well like you did then he will be stalked. I think this shows that we have done very good skeptical analyses of problems and this makes them mad.

I take this now as a laughing matter and it proves me the opposite what he wanted to achieve that I am doing a good job if I was not then no one would attack me and tell lies about me and you.. It seems we have done a great job so far.

Congradulations you made it onto the radar of the wacko SS

[Gord]

Does that mean I am famous?

I have my own stalker.

Looks to me like he just grabbed your name at random. He may not even remember it now. Who knows? But if it only happens once, I think you're safe.

[Shen1986]

Does that mean I am famous?

I have my own stalker.

Looks to me like he just grabbed your name at random. He may not even remember it now. Who knows? But if it only happens once, I think you're safe.

Thanks for the nice words.

[Gord]

Does that mean I am famous?

I have my own stalker.

Looks to me like he just grabbed your name at random. He may not even remember it now. Who knows? But if it only happens once, I think you're safe.

Thanks for the nice words.

Okay, fine, you're famous! Happy now?

[JonDonnis]

Please remove my name from this thread, you are quoting a libellous post on another site.

I want nothing to do with your fight, that site or anyone involved.

I would appreciate your speedy response in this matter

[Poodle]

Seems a bit of a daft request, Jon, considering you posted it under your own name. It would surely be more in line with your requirements to contact site admin directly, which you can do by using the email address at the bottom of the page.

[octopus1]

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

[Flash]

Look...if we didn't have the internet we wouldn't have to deal with {!#%@} like this.

[octopus1]

Look...if we didn't have the internet we wouldn't have to deal with {!#%@} like this.

Absolutely.

I'll respond by shaving a hog and tattooing some words on its loin, then arrange to have it dropped within a two-mile radius of your location.

(Just in case, of course : )

I actually really could (possibly). but something tells me that dead pigs with "Right On!!" scorched into them, wouldn't constitute "a welcome rainfall"...

[scrmbldggs]

Bacon lovers might not mind it raining fats and hogs.

[octopus1]

Bacon lovers might not mind it raining fats and hogs.

Then I shall endeavor to follow your "Polar Vortex" with a precipitation of pork products. And then I'll try to determine whether a "Polar Vortex" is a real thing (No really), or merely a popular media soundbite

[scrmbldggs]

Don't use this.

[octopus1]

Don't use this.

Dreidel?

(Oh, please let me be correct, without even bothering Google! )

It's not that is it

[scrmbldggs]

Yup, a little spin top oracle.

[octopus1]

Yup, a little spin top oracle.

It's like Astrology with wood...

"It's over there!"
"Where?"
"You're pointing at it!"
"No I'm not, it's... Oh, yeah, now I understand....."

[Gord]

...And then I'll try to determine whether a "Polar Vortex" is a real thing (No really), or merely a popular media soundbite

"It's Meteorology 101...For all the doubters out there; stuff it!" -- NBC weatherman Al Roker, displaying the polar vortex entry in his 1959 textbook

[octopus1]

...And then I'll try to determine whether a "Polar Vortex" is a real thing (No really), or merely a popular media soundbite

"It's Meteorology 101...For all the doubters out there; stuff it!" -- NBC weatherman Al Roker, displaying the polar vortex entry in his 1959 textbook

But it sounds like a Sci-Fi channel movie! Why does it have to be a real weather event, instead of a Deborah Gibson flop

"A close call with an Asteroid and a Comet sends the Earth into a rapid rotation sequence, causing electrical systems to fail and pigeons to malfunction. Only one woman can stop this - Dr. Paula Vortex."

Some memorable quotes:

"This isn't some small piddle storm - It's a cataclysm!"

"I'm Professor Zap "Unlikely Name" Heroesdorff. This rock was over 1000 Fahrenheit, traveling at 240 miles per hour and was as much as 30 cubits wide. As you can probably tell by my non-preferred unit measurements, I'm an expert in Space Rock Physics."

Absolute classic. There's a sequel in the works too. "Incorrect Tail Alignment Comet Vs. Gigantic Plot Device Asteroid"

[Whitedude]

JonDonnis
Banned Troll
Posts: 63

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... 17555.html

I think we are dealing with a troll. I removed my comment anyway.

[Gord]

Whitedude?!? I thought someone said you'd been banned from here!

Wow my mind must be going....

[Poodle]

That was my error, Gord, when I was trying to count the number of Mark/Cobalt sockpuppets after Pyrrho's sweep. Whitedude had deactivated his own account and so got lumped in with the genuine (?) Mark accounts.