Fair-Mindedness ain’t for Sissies

[coberst]

Fair-Mindedness ain’t for Sissies

To be fair-minded one must be vigilant (consciousness plus intention) of the need to treat all viewpoints alike.  This demands that we adhere to intellectual standards such as accuracy and sound reasoning, which are unaffected by self-interest.

A contrast with fair-mindedness is intellectual self-centeredness.

Fair-mindedness is a challenging task that demands a family of character traits:  intellectual humility, courage, empathy, honesty, perseverance, and a confidence in the value of reason.

Our culture places maximum value not on fair-mindedness but upon self-interest, and maximizing production, and consumption.  

Intellectual humility begins with the recognition that absolute certainty regarding any matter of fact is beyond human capacity.  There exists no mind-independent reality that we have the capacity to know.  We can know only that which is “colored” by our experiences and historical perspective.

Our common sense views, coupled with philosophical tradition and religious dogma, all teach us that such is not the case, that we can find absolute certainty.  This cultural tradition works aggressively against our goal of intellectual humility thus demanding that we must become more intellectually sophisticated in order to gain the level of intellectual humility required.

Intellectual courage is a difficult assignment.  We all tend to place great value on our own opinion, which is more often than not just something that we grabbed as it flew by.  But this is even more of a problem when we are “wedded” to something that we have a strong commitment to, for what ever reason.  Our political affiliation is one example.

Intellectual courage is especially difficult, and even dangerous to our well being when we hold ideas that society considers them to be dangerous; even though we are confident that they are rationally grounded.  Society often punishes severely all forms of nonconformity; the execution of Socrates by the citizens of Athens might serve as a good example.  

By developing this character trait of intellectual courage we will often be ostracized from a group or even a large community.  Such an experience will give us incentive to recognize that most people live their lives in such a manner as to be secure in the middle of the approval of those about us.

Intellectual courage ain’t for sissies!

Intellectual empathy is a consciousness that one must engage the imagination in an effort to intellectually place your self into the shoes of another so as to comprehend that other person as well as possible. To accomplish this transaction we must try to learn as much as possible about the other person’s situation so as to reconstruct that person’s assumptions, premises, and ideas.

Many of these ideas were gleaned from the book Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life by Richard Paul and Linda Elder

[vanderpoel]

Fair-Mindedness ain’t for Sissies

Whatʻs fair about that?

[Tom-Palven]

Intellectual humility will take some work.

[landrew]

Fairness? "BO-RING!" to quote Homer Simpson.  

At risk of being labeled elitist, fairness has a lower entertainment value than unfairness.  That's why more people watched Jerry Springer than watched Charlie Rose. I wish more people would break away from the crowd and demand a higher level of accountability in these debates.  

I wouldn't consider that boring.

[vanderpoel]

Fairness? "BO-RING!" to quote Homer Simpson.  

At risk of being labeled elitist, fairness has a lower entertainment value than unfairness.  That's why more people watched Jerry Springer than watched Charlie Rose. I wish more people would break away from the crowd and demand a higher level of accountability in these debates.  
I wouldn't consider that boring.

OK, Iʻll entertain your wish and demand a higher level
of accountability for your claim that "fairness has a lower
entertainment value than unfairness" and your leap to the
conclusion "That's why more people watched Jerry Springer
than watched Charlie Rose."
That ought to be entertaining.

[landrew]

I've known quite a few idiots who thought unfairness was a virtue, I even worked for a few of them. I grew up watching the old wrestling shows, and I remember when they started to spice things up by getting the referees to make outrageously unfair decisions.  That formula has been successful in a lot of other forms of entertainment and sports as well.  It's a good way to persuade the youngsters that cheating is a good way to get ahead.

But we grownups know that fairness is the strength and unfairness is a weakness. In fact, fairness and toughness go together quite well as a set of virtues.  I guess it depends whether you care how you got to the finish line or not.

It looks to me like those virtues were set aside in the business world for the last 20 years or so, and now we're all going to pay the price for decades to come.

[vanderpoel]

I've known quite a few idiots who thought unfairness was a virtue, I even worked for a few of them. I grew up watching the old wrestling shows, and I remember when they started to spice things up by getting the referees to make outrageously unfair decisions.  That formula has been successful in a lot of other forms of entertainment and sports as well.  It's a good way to persuade the youngsters that cheating is a good way to get ahead.

It is fair to say that you accounted well
for your claim that unfairness has a higher
entertainment value.
Sorry to be not more entertaining.